Tuesday, 19 February 2019

Being : "fitting in" or "belonging"

Over the summer I have enjoyed reading and learning with Brene Brown. My most recent book was  'Braving the wilderness'.  Chapter seven sparked my thinking and reflection about  inclusion and in particular 'fitting in and or 'belonging'. 

"If I get to be me, I belong,
If I have to be like you, I fit in"


My dog was the perfect example of this as a labrador staffy cross. While away at Benmore camping at Christmas (Sale's first ever camping holiday), sitting down at the lake edge watching the kids playing, a lady walked by, Sale was contented hanging out with us, the lady went to pat Sale, and a  growl came; labrador became staffy. 
"Wow she goes from cute to scary in a second" the lady responded. "Sorry she's not good with people she doesn't know" or she only trusts the people in her tribe.

 
Salehabanu, my beautiful, loyal, stubborn girl of nearly 12 years.


All my life I have been desperate for a dog; growing up we weren't allowed one. So when I brought my house I saved a dog from trademe. I got Sale at 10 months old from a Chinese lady whose partner had returned to China.  I fell in love with 'Doh' straight away and 10 minutes later she was in my car. She was renamed Salehabanu after a student who I taught in London.  

500 metres from my house is a dog park; Sale was trained; could sit, wait (most of the time)  but she  hadn't had much time out of the previous owner's back path. At the dog park she loved to get chased but if anydog came between me and her she would 'bark' with spit flying. One such day a man told us off because he thought with this spit on his dog's fur that she had made teeth-contact. Sale didn't belong here at this time.

Sale became a lab with lots of staffy; her head and her swag became prominent outside of ours and tribe-member's homes, people  looked at her warily. She became more reactive post earthquakes, and struggled to share the beach and park; and the new red-zones became our place of choice where she was able to run free amongst the geese and I had 360 degree view of people or dogs coming into our space.

At the same time I got Sale,  in my class was a boy who also liked to run; flight or fight. Initially he would escape anxious moments by climbing up a tree until one day he picked up a 'four by two' and hit his tormenter in the head. This caused an outrage at school but for me I had empathy for this boy and his mother. This was when I understood anxiety and the perils of it. I was experiencing it with a dog who didn't fit in or in someways couldn't be trusted because of anxiety and reaction. 

This was when I redesigned our classroom to be collaborative. The desks became empty and in 2 big groups so that we could have circle time throughout the day. Ownership of desks did not belong. Books were placed in baskets and pens/ pencils were shared. Students were encouraged to work with others but not forced. Friends were encouraged, worked on. Games were a big part of our day with jigsaws and collaborative/integrated tasks open throughout the day. Whole class teaching didn't happen and group work happened all the time. Hui and fono were also everyday as we built a class on voice, self-managing and 'fingers-crossed' belonging.

"Belonging is being somewhere you want to be and they want you,

Fitting in is being somewhere you want to be but they don't care one way or the other"

Brene Brown




Now, today.... two boys come to mind in our learning space, both because of their relationship posts I regularly get. One looks different and one is new (late last year) to the school. I feel both are trying to fit in, and do they feel they belng?

At Haeata one of our values is:




Edged in my brain is this 'fitting in or belonging' and the impact of this.

One lunch time a couple of weeks ago, one of the boys I'm reflecting on sat in our collaborative building. Like many before him he connected his phone to the tv so he could play his music of choice through a speaker. His space was also close to the space many Kaiako choose to spend their lunchtime chatting and eating in. In the 30 minute period that I sat nearby, the tv he was connected to was turned off four times. Why? I stepped in four times to speak to the students, supposedly because they didn't like the "student's" music. His music was in no way offensive and really was it the music or the student.


In Helen Street's book 'Contextual Wellbeing', chapter seven addresses Building cohesion. She states ' Cohesion is the powerful social glue that turns us from human beings into people.'  This student who was targeted for his music looks different to many and he struggles to have healthy relationships with his peers because of his inappropriateness at times in both words and actions. But in reality is this his way of trying to fit in? Others can play their music, swear, do hand gestures and have inappropriate conversations. Is his targeting because of his behaviours or because of his looks?

Dr Street shares "In the language of social psychology, social cohesion develops out of 'personal attraction' between members of any given group and the sharing of rules and norms within that group. 'Personal attraction is a term used to represent a liking for others based on shared traits and goals, and a sense of belonging to the group as a whole."

"Belonging is being accepted for you, Fitting in is being accepted for            being like everyone else "

Brene Brown



What does this really look like at school?  In both our modern learning spaces and single-cell classes, is it easier in one than the other? What role does the Kaiako play?  Dr Street states " foremost, teachers need to develop positive relationships with all of their students....The teacher's first skills must be to know how to listen, how to guide students socially and emotionally and how to help outsiders come in from the cold". 

How does this happen in a learning space with over 400 students and 30 kaiako? Are we as Kaiako  biased by our relationships with some students rather than others and is there such a thing as relationship bias? (This is a space I would like to explore more about- please leave comments if you can support me in this- blog to come). Do we listen better to others? Do some of our students consider us part of their tribe and play us? Do we normalise some behaviour for some students and complain about similar behaviour in others?

Dr Helen Street refers to it being the "established norms that guide the behaviour of those who feel they belong. Rules are written down and made explicit whereas norms are established through the repetition of certain behaviours and reinforced with every element of social context. Norms are the true behavioural guides within any group....Norms develop through repeating desired behaviours and contextual support not through repeated verbal reminders."

She goes on to continue " Normative behaviour can also be encouraged with a contextual assumption of normality. The more we treat others according to the norms we would like to follow, the more they will follow these norms" and vice versa. In the sense of the student above if I/we ignored the actions of others what behaviour were we as Kaiako normalising? And when after four disruptions to his 'play', he erupted,  who would be in the wrong? The student who erupted or the students who played a part in his escalated frustration?  If we only listen to one side of the story and assume the outcome to be correct what is the norm we are then allowing?

Taking the time to build cohesion will create our value Manaakitanga, to be a reality for all of our students and mean that school is not a lonely space.

And in my time of grief for my beautiful girl, I know that although she didn't necessarily  fit in, she knew where she belonged! xxx
Sale RIP











Thursday, 14 February 2019

Just "Being"

This week I lost my dog; my loyal, stubborn, beautiful constant.


What I miss is her just 'being',

How mindful she could be when she was just being, observing the fly, hearing the car turn into the driveway, the neighbours' door open,  listening, observing, readiness ....

How can we take this into our everyday day? 

How can we take this "being' into  teaching? 

What does being mindful moments 

in teaching/learning look like?


Being mindful to me is about being in the moment (hence my oneword2019; MOMENT)
I see this as being at your most alert;  to what is around you (just like Sale, although not with eyes closed).

At one of our whole school PD sessions last year  (term 2) we had to define the role of a kaiako, I defined it as a list:
        My role as a Teacher:
           #Mentor
           #Learner
           #Negotiator
           #Encourager
           #Supporter
           #Listener
           #Clarifier
           #Motivator
           #Provider
           #Restorer
           #Questioner
           #Provoker
           #Inquirer
           #Social worker
           #Referee
           #Recorder
           #Connector
           #Collaborator
           #Juggler

In reflection of re-reading this list I noticed how active these words were and how they involved direct involvement between myself and the ākonga. What I know now is missing are the passive words:
         #observe
        #notice
        #witness

Actions that

  • allow autonomy to occur,   
  • Flow of learning to not be interrupted(a blog to come- currently curiously researching) 
  • and true resilience to flourish.


Via twitter I found this image that spoke my thinking:

In term three of last year (in our great merge) we considered our teacher expectations as:

Creating workshops for Korowai-Kaupapa
Delivering and workshops for Korowai-Kaupapa
Creating independent learning
Conferencing
Space Support
Puna Ako kaiako role- Social emotional Development
Puna Ako Kaiako- role- supporting learning process
MAI Time Workshops
Be a collaborative Team member
Be a learner

My favourite roles were conferencing and Puna ako Kaiako (especially Mentor- social emotional and support learning) ; it was when I saw the personalised learning approach flourish. 

While conferencing one day I saw a beautiful example of resilience; not because I was alongside the learners (two students) but because I happened to notice  while conferencing another, the moment of magic.  Two learners who were usually non-participants (my term for dis-engaged- my current teacher inquiry)  were working with illustrator to create a manaia, stuck in the process they tried to help each other and then sought help from a kaiako. This for me was huge, as shy non-participants they could of given up, put of by the frustration of the moment. Even when the kaiako didn't immediately respond because they were working with someone else,  they respected this and  were patient in the waiting, not led to distraction by other tabs opening in that wait.  

One of these  ākonga I spotted another day with another non-participant, being quiet in the quiet space doing a jigsaw. A new passion? Could we utilise this moment as mentor teachers to drive the progression to engagement. What can we provide/ suggest for this ākonga as their independent inquiry?
 
These acts of these non-participants had played in my mind and are the motivator for what our Kaitiaki roles have become as a  collaborative progression of my thinking 'being'. In our spaces, for true autonomy to occur how can we support the 'stuck moments', especially when using technology , what can we put in place to reduce our busyness as kaiako to support the next steps, so that ākonga practising resilience or in moments of 'being' resilient seek the support they need.

Something to explore further as Tuakana Kaitiaki. Let's reduce dependency of adult intervention and have the prompts,props and  support available at the click of the button or the glance of the wall.

Also as Kaiako be mindful during conferencing- what magic is occuring at that moment? Take a lool? Notice then be an observer. Do we need to interrupt or can we narrate from afar. 



Tuesday, 15 January 2019

‘Being’

I'm really lucky to work at a place I love! A place where everything challenges the traditional and provokes us to seek more;  

to BE learners. 


Term three last year I chose to be part of a book group and 'wow' had I found my niche.
The topic (BookRaising children who refuse to be raised) and a tribe of educators keen to discuss trauma/hauora and learning. This grew my need to explore more and an opportunity came for me to be part of a Wellbeing tour in Australia; exploring Positive Education. 

I had not only found my niche but I had also found my passion in Education.

I  opened books; read intently /highlighted, note-took, sketchnoted, tweeted, skimmed or listened to them, I revisited old textbooks...  I was BEING, in a learning state, motivated by the 'yes' moments and wanting to  unpack more,   I was immersed in the "flow" of learning. 
 I was BEING a self-determined learner. 



As I reflected on both the content and the process along with my experiences, thoughts, discussions and tweets; One book stood out for me;  Contextual Wellbeing by Dr Helen Street.  This book  perfectly articulated my thinking  about Wellbeing and has become my bible as such.



This reflection led me to this provocation:

Wellbeing: Lets first focus on the 'BEING'

so it leads to the 'WELL'

At Haeata we have good structures in place (Choice, Hauora, Whanau liason, Relationship focus,  Project based, Mentor groups, Puna ako, Mai Time, Kaupapa ako, Inquiry, workshops, Modern buildings...) but do we know how to BE in these 'spaces'.


Lets look at the word 'Space' literally: 

When I wrote my #oneword2019 blog, I gave an example of 'liberating' the learners at Haeata, because they can: 
  •  work in a space conducive to their passion and wants.

What did I mean?

At the end of last year I spent a lot of my release time in the music room, kitchen and garden.
Why because thats where our mentor group chose to 'be' for their self-determined learning and so to support their accountability I joined them rather than  battle about where, who and what else they could/should be doing. They were where they wanted to be and doing their learning with who they wanted to learn with.

 
 

 This led me to ask how we can make our spaces more conducive to extending their learning; this is a space our ākonga wellbeing needs are being met but how can we also drive autonomy in their learning within the spaces they choose to be?.

Now comes the tribe again: sharing my thinking with a fellow Kaiarahi, she linked this idea of 'being' to the self determined framework,

 

and together with our other Kaiarahi we drove this 'being' and ARC  as a driver for exploring better use of our learning spaces for our Tuakana teacher only days.

Then our Kaiako became Kaitiaki of the spaces they hold a passion for and delved into how the space can drive autonomous learning.

It was exciting to see this happen and where we can go....My thinking now:


This web lead me to consider the impact of the teacher and what is it to "BE" a teacher; 
the feelings we invoke and the norms we allow. 
How we facilitate learning in our spaces. 
Or
 What is it like for  ākonga to enter a space that is occupied - to "Be" in the space with others? 
(blogs to come)

Thoughts:

being inclusive - being strong - being an observer - being resilient - being trusted - being respectful-  being independent - being collaborative - being a collective - being dependent - being in the flow - being courageous -  being fair -  being open - being responsive- being engaged - being empowered -being competitive - being inspired - being free - being rushed - being smothered - being overwhelmed - being patient-

-being me-

 
And for me now after 4 days at school and with my #oneword2019-MOMENT- take a moment to breath and to not speed up the rush:

Sourced from Dr Libby (instagram)



Monday, 31 December 2018

#oneword2019: MOMENT (reflection of 2018)

As I reflect on 2018 my mind only seems to go our last two terms; not because it seems an eternity away but because of the 'success' of those terms. I  remember it clearly four days into the term; myself and 3 colleagues,  sat in our new Ihutai cafe excited, joyful, relieved of what we were embarking on despite the grumbles. We felt like we were doing what we came to Haeata to do: Personalized self determined learning.

As I reflect I can't but not admit the vulnerabilities I had also felt; with the haste of the merge that had brought about our significant changes so we could walk our Haeata talk.

But I had the courage to not fight it or postpone it but climb down off the fence and support my initiating leadership colleagues and move the furniture in to play (literally).

One word comes to mind as I reflect; LIBERATING

This was a word I used a lot as I talked of our change and of school; with friends, family, colleagues and the wider community (our PODCAST and chat with CORE).

It was liberating as a teacher to:

  • not label myself as a Primary teacher and others as Secondary; we didn't decipher anymore.
  • collaborate as a leader and not be overwhelmed with stuff but have clear roles and meetings.
  • share responsibility of our learning narratives and work collectively to record through our timetabled role as a conferencing kaiako.
  • to check in with my/our mentor group throughout the day not just during Puna ako time.
  • to explore social emotional learning and self-actualisation through learning and wellbeing. 
It was liberating for our learners to:
  • not be a number or a year level cohort but an individual.
  • choose between workshops and inquiry.
  • be met 3 (should be 4) times a day by a mentor teacher who cares about them and their learning.
  • work in a space conducive to their passion and wants.
  • work with their friends. 
  • continue to not have the battle about being in uniform.
I also reflect on myself; as a teacher. I really began to  understand  my passions of education; diversity and self-actualisation. Within my role as Kaiarahi I had the opportunity to go to Sydney and Melbourne on a Positive Wellbeing venture with Rebecca, Andy and Leonie. See blogs; Mount View High School, Knox Grammar and Dr Paula Robinson (tbp) , Geelong Grammar
This trip was a huge highlight for me both for its 'AHA'  and 'YES!'  moments but also for the awakening of me as a leader. The time to think, reflect and blog with the affirmation that my thinking was on point. I felt proud again.

It was these moments and the digesting of the two books  read: Contextual Wellbeing and Timeless Learning, that made me choose MOMENT over PROVOKE and GRIT. Below are my further thinkings of how MOMENT is reflected.

This is my oneword for 2019; rather than the setting of the goals (blog coming re this)  and will drive me to explore more and grow further. 

See my twitter thread: of moments in time through the year as sharing, reflection and GRIT    #myword2019

Power of the moment - Take a moment - Capture the moment - Teachable moment - Learn from the moment
A moment in time - It’s only a moment - Seize the moment - See the moment - Let go of the moment

Connect with moment - Provoke the moment - Give a moment - Aha moment - Redirect the moment

Recharge moment - Unleash moment - Breath through the moment - Silent moment - A courageous moment - Presence in the moment  - Grit moment - Feel the moment - Acknowledge the moment -Choosing the moment -Think beyond the moment - Share the moment - In the zone moment 
(Brene Brown - Daring to Lead) building trust moment - "Oh sh•t moment 

Switch off moment - Unplug moment






Sunday, 11 November 2018

Positive Education : Mount View High School

Monday 22 October

We met with Desley Pfeffer (Principal), 2 Deputy Principals,
3 Wellbeing leaders-Julie Myers, Graeme and Amy Johnson
and Lincoln Comans, the counsellor with his dog.

We were met at the gate, the school is a large
two-storey brick building. Mount View High School is a rural school, about 2 hours out of Sydney.
It is a lower decile school situated next to a correctional facility. 8% of the students parents go to University and employment has decreased in the area.
Employment opportunities exist in the winery and construction areas. The community tend to stay in the area.


We met in the staff common room for morning tea and then were presented with a folder and their resources/books
they utilise in their programme.

Mount View High School are in their fifth year of this programme and Desley is a major driver of the programme.
This year she set aside $50 000 budget for their Positive Education Programme.

Their journey is documented in a booklet they produced using the budget along with visual prompts around the school.
 Positive Wellbeing is one of the 3 focusses for the school and has purposely been placed as the first focus.
The school use the '5 ways to wellbeing' which they have adapted form NEF 2008.

        
Their programme has run through its three year cycle. It operates in the school's roll call that has been renamed check-in.
'Whanau' groups are vertical year 7-12 and are made from their house groups.
Currently one teacher works with a group (number not asked) but there is the possibility of pairing staff to better support explicit wellbeing teaching.

Lessons operate 2-4 times a week during the 15 minute check in. Each element of the wellbeing wheel are explicitly taught over 4 week stint which includes
modelling and discussion of the lessons at a whole school meeting. The lessons do allow flexibility but buy-in is not strong. SLT (Principal and Deputies are roaming
at this time for modelling and pressure for lessons to occur. Executive team are disappointed with the commitment to the lessons,

Alongside this they also run targeted interventions eg ASIST for suicide (5 mentions a day/ a suicide occurred last January.

A catch phrase Desley used was adapted when the school song was created:
Stand up,
Step forward,
Move ahead


Mount View School are looking to:
  • embed character strengths into their suspension resolution meeting and process
  • embed character strengths into check-in
  • one pager lesson plan
Interesting to note that they did not consider increasing the time for the lessons.


My considerations for us:
- Use what we have- dispositions (authentic) and make connections
- Can we trial a lesson plan for our Sexuality lessons linked to consent- then evaluate the process for looking to 2019
-unpack dispositions through character strengths- activity for 2019 (ākonga and kaiako).


Taught Curriculum
  1. Advice on how your contextualise the curriculum?,
  2. Resources being used?
  3. What sequence was used for the rollout?
  4. Timeframe for the rollout?
  5. What helps with the rollout?
  6. Amount of training done?

Caught Curriculum
  • Implicit teaching of wellbeing of all teachers
  • Modeling - sound wellbeing practices used in everyday classes
  • (how manage wellbeing of staff with impact of pastoral care and general practice)

  1. How did you go about building wellbeing in everyday classes?  Timeframe taken?
  2. Building and maintaining respectful relationships in the classroom?
  3. How do they demonstrate care for the students?
  4. Amount of training done?

Learnings
  1. How do you are a school/group share amongst the staff what’s working both explicit and implicit?
  2. Wellbeing Team - What help to turn around the doubters / getting buy in from them?
  3. Wellbeing Team - Do you work with other schools to share your progress / discuss ideas or would you be interest in work with Haeata, ie Professional Learning Network
  4. Things/Actions to be avoided?
  5. What measures (KPIs) do you use to measure wellbeing?

Check out:
-Kurri High ( Graeme commented on its disengagement programme he is hoping to run 2020.)
-The lift project 
-Books: 

Leaders in the field of Wellbeing: Geelong Grammar outside Melbourne

School visit: Geelong Grammar  Justin Robinson- Director of Institution of Positive Education 
Geelong Grammar 
Applied model of Positive Education

   



 Positive Education is completely entwined within the school mission.

'The philosophy that underpins the School’s understanding of Exceptional Education is manifest in our purpose, spirit, focus, character and beliefs'

OUR PURPOSE 

is to inspire our students and community to flourish and make a positive difference through our unique and transformational education adventures

OUR FOCUS 

is learning to flourish

OUR SPIRIT 

is making a positive difference

OUR CHARACTER 

is to be authentic, courageous, dedicated, forgiving, inquiring, loving, optimistic, passionate, resilient and trusting

WE BELIEVE

  • our rigorous academic programmes create wonder, curiosity and a desire to learn
  • boarding and co-education provide valuable life skills
  • partnerships between our parents, staff and students provide the best learning outcomes
  • Positive Education enhances wellbeing and enables individuals to flourish
  • our exceptional staff bring character and richness to the life of the School
  • in the power of creative thinking and the courage to try new ideas
  • in fostering spirituality and celebrating our Anglican tradition
  • in serving others and building social responsibility
  • in nurturing strong relationships
  • in growing our heritage through innovation
  • in the protection of children and a zero tolerance of child abuse

OUR CHALLENGE

is to develop creative thinking and learning to engage with the complex opportunities of a changing world

------------------
Geelong Gramar is made up of 4 campus. We visited the Corio Campus (Middle School- Years 5 to 8) and Senior School (year 10-12)  but they also have Bostock (ELC to year 4 situated in Geelong), Toorak (ELC to year 6 situated in Melbourne), Timbertop- a year 9 all year camp, 3 hours away from the Corio Campus. Students only access to families is during the holidays and through handwritten letters. They run a marathon at end; the focus is on growth both physical and character.  Their weekends occur on a Wednesday and a Thursday so that Saturdays and Sundays are class days due to the area being busy with bushwalking clubs. NB no sports for the year 9s.
Staff can live on site in one of the 100 school houses and can eat in the dinner hall, use the Handbury Wellbeing Centre (gym/pool/ basketball courts). Staff who take this opportunity are rostered to support  dorms  outside of school hours. All teachers including those not living in are required to take a sport(s) (support). 
Requirements  (load) for staff: (Standard)
full teaching (4/6 50min periods)/ co-curricular eg sport/ chapel (dorm/house support)
1300 students are at Geelong Grammar across all the campus'; 800 board. The school have a strong link to Cambridge, England with its founding members bringing Cambridge blue as its number ones colour (blazer). Generally students wear their second uniform featuring their house colour.

The boarding rooms (houses) are similar to the look of Christ College and we went into a room that housed 15 girls. The girls can personalise their wall above bed with photos etc. each boarding room have a prep room with desks with slight enclosure line the wall where the students keep their books and can put their character strengths on display. The girls dorm, girls had quotes linked to character strengths whereas the boys didn't.

All staff are inducted into Geelong by attending the Institute's 3 day residential PD retreat (Justin Robinson) this includes gardeners.

Positive Education is taught explicitly one period a week in the middle school, year 9 living it & breathing it through outside pursuits, and years 10 to 12 have 3 sessions. Students do a Character strength profile, it appears houses & dorms also  do this too with the visual displays of the words. Heads of departments share at meeting how wellbeing is entwined/ embedded through subjects.

In the middle school classes are separated into year levels but  2 classrooms with a flexible wall. Classes are operating with 2 teachers and 30 students approx. Pedagogical change with inquiry focus. Character strengths evident in the class including teachers sharing theirs on the door.  At Timbertop they have converted the character strength wheel into a coffee table so it is visual everyday for teachers too. 

Senior School is still traditional in their silo subjects but strong in positive education. Exams have for example mindfulness pre exam or one less question and instead a question related to the student and their evaluation for the prep of the exam.

Justin Robinson is the director of the Institute of Positive Education that is a self-funded business made up of 25 staff. The Institute has a dual purpose; support Geelong Grammar (sustainability of Positive Education programme) and grow the field of Positive Education (PD opportunities). The Grammar students needs are string- pressure with academic, learning, anxiety but also for some issues around boarding-separation from family  (homesickness) and then the other extreme "feeling loved" when parents busy and a feeling of being 'unloved'.

Notes from our discussion:

  • What is sustainable? Committment to Positive Education is necessary for sustainability but not committment to tools. Tools are not sustainable and can be introduced through excitement. For example mindfulness and gratitude wall. Start with something being discussed as a short time frame for initial buy in and then it can increase in time with the enthusiasm it may bring. Don't put off grow/ extend with voice- allow for trial and error and personalisation of tools.
  • How we draw people to us but not pushing things on to them (see Rebecca's tweets) - buy in by staff- Not an add on but  embedded but initially need to let something go so busyness doesn't bring negative bias or make it get lost.
  • Conversations are crucial- Wellbeing can not be prescribed but described (see Rebecca's tweet).
  • Wellbeing is deeply personal - on average mindfulness will work-have to work out what works now.
  • Students/ adults can be "over wellbeing-ed" simplicity is crucial, have to live it not hate it, ensure you de-clutter the visual and the talk too. What's the now need?
  • Positive Psychology became because society is not getting right. But at times we need to feel safe eg trauma (earthquake/ mental health redflag/ abuse) survival needs to be met but when experiencing non-trauma just hecticness/ pressure of everyday life look to wellbeing science and positive psychology.
  • Society is not changing so we need individual skills/ strategies to operate positively.
  • Positive Education is not an add on but a whole school approach
  • grow in language- feel it, do it, get it(see my tweet)
  • Negative and positive emotions make us grow- make a meaningful life- can't be happy all the time- how we handle the negative- build conversations around it (see also Live more happy book- love & fear emotion strongest)
  • include wellbeing in every meeting agenda - maybe also start/finish with AI - appreciative to bring a positive vibe
  • Compassion- caring for others- giving brings positivity but at same time  not  losing or putting pressure on yourseelf- eg oxygen mask first/ fill your glass
  • Authentic embedding - can fit in beautifully through kaupapa (osmosis) - just adding an evaluative question too- family tree- character strengths of family members/ancestors- role models/ character evaluation (NOT TOKEN)
  • skills and knowledge to manage life and care for others

  • POSITIVE EDUCATION is not a SPECTATOR SPORT

  • works on trust
  • is about the whole child
  • be wary of survey-burnout- students need to see results asap otherwise why and not buy in for next time - feed enthusiasm- also provoke the timing of survey is this us doctoring the results? Anonymous brings real results- consider it just as a snapshot of a group- effective as a voice for evolution of a programme

  • GENUINE

Tweets:

Recommendations:
Corinda State High School
Acceptance Commitment Therapy: ACT    ACT   (google search)
Book: Happiness trap
Study: Study of Sleep (studnet focus) and Compassion (poss more staff)- Dr Tony Fernando
Measure: Melbourne  Uni wellbeing profiler




Tuesday, 23 October 2018

Today show: Perfect Parents?

The pressure today to be perfect is high and detrimental for many. This morning as I pack my bags on our Wellbeing trip to move from Sydney to Melbourne I stopped to engage with this segment on the Today Show.

Perfectionism as a barrier for wellbeing was first brought to my attention at the Pause, breath, smile mindful training I did last year. On the course were a number of staff from Selwyn House who were trying to address the impact of stress caused by the girls' need to be perfect; perfect marks, perfect feedback, gratification that I'm perfect.

Is perfectionism just an implication of comparison and not the strength of oneself? The result of standardisation testing, national standards and impact of social media

Is  the impact of comparison the focus we look at: being proud of ourselves and where we are at now?

Like what Dr Paula Robinson reaffirmed my thinking towards the focus being  on the process rather than the outcome.

Today's segment - Georgie with a mother and expert Dr Judith Locke (Clinical Psychologist:
Wanting to be perfect comes from others one-upmanship, shaming or judging  - ditch the pursuit of perfectionism and be 'good enough' which is itself hard enough- ok to also drop the ball.

A measure of a parent's success is how their  kids turnout- a parent's greatest project- but implication of individualisation

Judith Locke: "Being perfect is impossible" Falling short brings forth the emotion of guilt.
daunting - too much short-term info about making the child happy & successful & important that if a parent is not at the school event your child is not doing it for you their audience but for themselves.

Be open and acknowledge the struggles and vulnerability and remove the competition to mothers' groups.

Judith's KEY to pratice:
-Each day how have I helped my child help themself?
-allow your child to face more challenges, (builds resilience), take responsibility and to not be subserviant (doormat) so your child respects you.
-be 'present'- slowly step back - but arms open allow own person- know there - apart but realsie you are their for support/
-Not there to be the child's friend but as their parent
-LET THEM BE!

A bumpy ride is ok

Totally makes sense for teachers too!


PROVOCATION to my thinking?
Does my wanted focus on self-actualisation (reaching my potential) need to include the comparison of others to be perfect?
Do zones of proximal development limit ākonga?