Wednesday, 5 September 2018

Collective responsibility

With the rise in collaborative working spaces the term collective responsibility is becoming an important term.

 Collective Responsibility For Learning And Education. ... The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy refers to collective responsibility as a shared responsibility (Smiley, 2005). 

My pondering questions: 
What could this look like?
What could this feel like?
What could this sound like?
What grows collective responsibility?
What stifles collective responsibility?

Karyn Gray refers in her blog post  Compliance and Complacency and Culture 
(Tuesday, August 28, 2018)
'True collaboration is about building a culture where  everyone on a team is working towards the same vision and everyone on the team is prepared to hold everyone else in the team to that vision. It's about building more, and better, together than you could possibly do by yourself.' I perceive collective responsibility to be the verb to allow this happen. Everyone sharing the responsibility to allow collaboration to be at its truest and strongest from.' 

Questioning my thinking I asked google: Could/is  collective responsibility,  a necessity for collaboration to occur? This sourced....
collaboration      

Guiding Principle 4: Learning is a collaborative responsibility. 

Teaching and learning are both collaborative processes. Collaboration benefits teaching and learning when it occurs on several levels: when students, teachers, family members, and the community collectively prioritize education and engage in activities that support local schools, educators, and students; when educators collaborate with their colleagues to support innovative classroom practices and set high expectations for themselves and their students; and when students are given opportunities to work together toward academic goals in ways that enhance learning. Research Summary Collaborative learning is an approach to teaching and learning that requires learners to work together to deliberate, discuss, and create meaning. Smith and MacGregor (1992) define the term as follows: 

“Collaborative learning” is an umbrella term for a variety of educational approaches involving joint intellectual effort by students, or students and teachers together. Usually, students are working in groups of two or more, mutually searching for understanding, solutions, or meanings, or creating a product. Collaborative learning activities vary widely, but most center on students’ exploration or application of the course material, not simply the teacher’s presentation or explication of it. (p. 1) 

Collaborative learning has been practiced and studied since the early 1900s. The principles are based on the theories of John Dewey (2009), Lev Vygotsky (1980), and Benjamin Bloom (1956). Their collective work focusing on how students learn has led educators to develop more student-focused learning environments that put students at the center of instruction. Vygotsky specifically stated that learning is a social act and must not be done in isolation. This principle is the foundation of collaborative learning. 

The research of Vygotsky (1980) and Jerome Bruner (1985) indicates that collaborative learning environments are one of the necessities for learning. Slavin’s (1989) research also suggests that students and teachers learn more, are more engaged, and feel like they get more out of their classes when working in a collaborative environment. Totten, Sills, Digby, and Russ (1991) found that those involved in collaborative learning understand content at deeper levels and have higher rates of achievement and retention than learners who work alone. They suggest that collaborative learning gives students opportunities to internalize their learning. 

A meta-analysis from the Cooperative Learning Center at the University of Minnesota concluded that having students work collaboratively has significantly more impact on learning than having students work alone (Johnson, Maruyama, Johnson, Nelson, & Skon, 1981). An analysis of 122 studies on cooperative learning revealed: 
• More students learn more material when they work together— talking through the material with each other and making sure that all group members understand—than when students compete with one another or work alone individualistically. 

• More students are motivated to learn the material when they work together than when students compete or work alone individualistically (and the motivation tends to be more intrinsic). 

• Students have more positive attitudes when they work together than when they compete or work alone individualistically.

 • Students are more positive about the subject being studied, the teacher, and themselves as learners in that class and are more accepting of each other (male or female, handicapped or not, bright or struggling, or from different ethnic backgrounds) when they work together. 

Collaboration can be between teachers, between students, and between teacher and student. 

Teacher-Teacher Collaboration It is critical for teachers to have the time to collaborate. Professional learning communities, which provide teachers with established time to collaborate with other teachers, have become a more common practice in recent years. Louis and Kruse (1995) conducted a case study analysis that highlighted some of the positive outcomes associated with professional learning communities, including a reduction in teacher isolation, increases in teacher commitment and sense of shared responsibility, and a better understanding of effective instructional practices. Professional learning communities encourage collaborative problem solving and allow teachers to gain new strategies and skills to improve and energize their teaching and classrooms. 

Another example of teacher-to-teacher collaboration is lesson study. This professional development process began in Japan. Lesson study is a collaborative approach to designing and studying classroom lessons and practice. The most critical components of lesson study are observation of the lesson, collection of data about teaching and learning, and a collaborative analysis of the data to further impact instruction (Lewis, 2002; Lewis & Tsuchida, 1998; Wang-Iverson & Yoshida, 2005). Some of these characteristics are similar to other forms of professional development—analyzing student work, cognitive coaching, and action research, to name a few—but the fact that it focuses on teachers observing a live lesson that was collaboratively developed is different than any other form of professional development. Lesson study is a way for teachers to work together, collect data, and analyze data to reflect on teaching and learning (Lewis, 2002). 

Student-Student Collaboration Collaborative learning not only allows students to engage deeply with content but also helps students build the interpersonal skills needed to be successful in college and careers. Johnson, Johnson, and Holubec (1993) state that collaborative learning provides students with the opportunity to develop social skills. They found that many of the outcomes expected as part of a collaborative learning activity corresponded with goals for student content understanding and skill attainment. The strategies associated with collaborative learning—such as role assignments, collaborative problem solving, and task and group processing—all build the social skills that students need to be successful when working with others. Additionally, these skills are important in preparing students for the world of work, where collaborative writing and problem-solving are key elements of many careers.

 There is a plethora of instructional and learning strategies that encourage student collaboration, including peer teaching, peer learning, reciprocal learning, team learning, study circles, study groups, and work groups, to name just a few (Johnson & Johnson, 1986). Collaborative inquiry, which combines many of the elements of student collaboration just mentioned, is a research-based strategy in which learners work together through various phases “of planning, reflection, and action as they explore an issue or question of importance to the group” (Goodnough, 2005 88). Collaborative inquiry brings together many perspectives to solve a problem, engaging students in relevant learning around an authentic question. It allows students to work together toward a common purpose to explore, make meaning, and understand the world around them (Lee & Smagorinsky, 2000). 

Teacher-Student Collaboration The purpose for collaboration in an educational setting is to learn and unpack content together to develop a shared understanding. HardingSmith (1993) points out that collaborative learning approaches are based on the idea that learning must be a social act. It is through interaction that learning occurs. Johnson and Johnson (1986) similarly emphasize that when students and teachers talk and listen to each other, they gain a deeper understanding of the content and can develop the skills necessary to negotiate meaning throughout their lives. 

Collaboration requires a shift from teacher-led instruction to instruction and learning that is designed by both teachers and students. Collaboration between student and teacher plays a critical role in helping students reflect and engage in their own learning experiences. The constructivist learning movement is one current example of efforts to increase the amount of collaboration between student and teacher occurring in the classroom. Mayer (2004) defines constructivist learning as an “active process in which learners are active sense makers who seek to build coherent and organized knowledge” (p. 14). Students coconstruct their learning, with the teacher serving as a guide or facilitator. The teacher does not function in a purely didactic (i.e., lecturing) role. Neo and Neo (2009) found that constructivism helps students develop problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and creative skills and apply them in meaningful ways. 

Probing Questions 
• How can you use collaborative learning processes to engage students in their learning? 

• How might you create space for teacher-teacher collaboration within your context? 



Thursday, 16 August 2018

What really matters- reimagining assessment for modern learning

                Bruce Dixon, Will Richardson          modernlearners.com          change.school
Made with Padlet
Initial thinking centred arond HOW rather than WHY

if we don't understand the WHY fully - the how is linked to what we know about school and the frame we bring.




Why assess (in general) before we think about HOW? How leads to us wanting an answer- answer not there yet to the why....

Distance between stakeholders of understanding - engaging with the conversations.

What is worth assessing and not?

Measure?  pitfalls? success for all? What does this look like without increasing of anxiety/ streaming/competition
How do we measure with the feeling of success- awhi kids not group- ANXIETY!!!
white paper- war on learning (Bruce Dixon)

When was learning a competitive sport? Teaching a competitive Sport
(Bruce Dixon)

Why do you exist? as a school
Mission/ vision definition (twitter)



A PIVOTAL moment in education-at crossroads- huge opportunities - some through technology but low down as a vehicle or influence but NOT a driver!!!




Behind the words what do we mean?? 
DEFINE learning
Do we have to show learning is happening everyday? We want to know akonga are learning??
Value/pitfall of OTJ


Are our assessments satisfying needs? 



lets make it all bout learning!!


Offloading when the test/exam is over! Drill content.....

Are we doing what we believe?

If we want to stop ākonga learning what do we do?
The left hand side only will succeed if left side works for teachers as well as students>
We trust you!! Its a culture- safety and support- no blame, judgement. (eek learning narrative data??)
I have your back as a leader
compliance and complancy- complancy replaces compliance

Now the loss of NATIONAL STANDARDS... what will/can this bring? for learners?  teaching to the test... data driven education- interpreted in a traditional way.


This is about trust, own trust, aware if trusted

Qualitaive vs Quantitative assessments

BELIEF/  vs PRACTICE - how strong is it?
ACTIONS vs WORDS
ETERNAL conflict
(resilient/risk-takers)

Finnish teachers are never evaluated - are we assessed or have we been assessed on the right hand side


COLLECTIVE change
Coherent in the message we send??



The affect of competition? Staying with the norm- supporting whanau wanting norm 

comfortable in our thinking not defensive!! Challenge with the criticiser doing the right side!!

discussions at the clubrooms about 'handwriting'
Lets put it back at then
Learning is not a competitive sport
A 6 year old shouldn't have to come to school to figure us out- let them grow their natural disposition to learning grow not be stilted!


Valve company - modelling the leftside as acompany - their handbook

Internet is transformative to our world!

Who are our kids?  Shadow a kid.....

EXPOSURE to experience- limit PASSION conversations

Social presence- online life- 

over- prescribing of drugs

tug of war for our kids with whanau wants for education and the known/ unknown.     
  As stuck in the middle of the now

tug of war with friends too-SEL, gaming 

Kids clean up our mess!!

can our people/kids discern fiction and non-fiction- navigate media landscape/google
'crap detector'

Most disruptive shift is AGENCY 
CONTEXTUAL shift- freedom to access through internet

Out of school kids roam-drone parents- compressing their experience in the natural world??





Why should schools exist?


CHALLENGING what teaching looks like?


Mission is built on...
Vision is built on...


Teachers can overhelp!! can hinder

We have to let go!

why is genius hour only an hour!!!!! Like Haeata

SEL- self directed - share with me a your....( from ) during learning  times
(screencastify-site)

SAMR- technology!!

technology is about FREEDOM to learn
(look at drowning statistics & parents on devices)



The power of the learning narrative- kaiako expectations
(complainer on the document-reading after criticism)

LIFTING the constraints
Pose the challenge without the scaffolds or instruction
Makerspace prompt: Make a bird, singing and dancing appreciated
Play-based learning at a high-level- My dream- resources available- eg. makerspace paintbrushes
Left mess can be a constraint??
balance and priority
Take away the workshops- and leave out resources

"They just play games in class"- deal with the behaviour - agency??
gaming/ screentime/ boogie man (social media)- DRONE PARENTING/ TEACHING 

Emotional side of school change- book

Moving from OLD to BOLD- making change in your school

Re-imagining assessment

the assessments we want
the teachers we want
the parents we want
the leaders we want

investigate norms of learning
















































Sunday, 29 April 2018

Roles of a teacher/leader

My Role as a Teacher:
  1. In my own classroom ( or in a  previous learning environment) what did I used to do that I still do:

       Work alongside akonga in groups- spending the majority of the time roaming

  1. What have I had to stop doing?

       flexibility with timetable- time management.

  1. What have I had to adapt?

      being in an office, working at school rather than home

  1. What new practices have I had to start?


The Role of a Leader in a Collaborative Environment:

  1. What does the phrase collective responsibility mean to me?

    A group all actively  supporting , driving the same goal/vision- collaborative practice.


  1. Where do I think my responsibility starts and ends?

   
Actively involved no start & end.


  1. What about the responsibilities of our leaders?
   
   Grow leadership & listen - actively involved - model

Monday, 2 April 2018

All can change in a week


Related image
This blog has sat as a draft for the last 10+ weeks- and as I reflect on it now 10+ days later I finish it to publish it. A real change in our ākonga yet I wonder if in our kaiako to the same degree.

It began week 5, term 3;
This blog is no doubt very different to the reflective post I typed in my head on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday this week. When I felt like I was struggling with the high teacher ratio,  lack of quality inquiry products and the stress of the impending celebration of learning and the feeling of babysitting. It would of focussed on the annoyance I was feeling of the frustration at a lack of team work and instead perceived selfishness. It would of questioned how we can teach with  80+ kids and 2 teachers.  Drawing me to buying my first bottle of wine in a month to destress!!
                     



Instead calmly I sit here on Friday focussed on both perseverance, trust, success and collaboration.
Our first exhibition of learning was a huge success because of the perseverance (stubborness) of Jono.
He stood strong against lots of comments from his kaiako that 'we' weren't ready. But wow- the 2 days leading up to the day I offered a mai time for inquiry time and had a big sign up. The day of the exhibition some ākonga continued to work through  their morning tea without any kaiako assistance.

The success of the exhibition also occured with the timely visit by a group of Principals and senior leaders through the Grow Waitaha; an authentic audience.



Teacher as Inquiry-Choice- Making our choice - observation

Here is an observation I was able to capture when we chose our second kaupapa for 2018.


These could be my case study for change. These learners were in my original puna ako data too.

Our influence-


kaupapa responses

Teacher as inquiry: Choice survey

  • SURVEY my Puna ako group:
INITIAL DATA:   (Google form- link existing spreadsheet

Teacher as inquiry: Developing my thinking further

My initial thoughts were Choice...
How can I inquire further?